‘So what seems to be the
trouble?’
|
Matthew 17:14-20; Acts 3:1-16
A few days ago, the Revd Dr Canon Nicholas G. Read called me.
‘Terry,’ he said, ‘Terry, would you like to preach on Sunday, May 10? It’s on
Matthew 17.’
‘Sure,’ I said. ‘Why not?’ After all, what the world needs right
now is another one of my sermons. So I went and looked at the beginning of
Matthew 17: the transfiguration of Jesus! But I preached on the transfiguration
just a couple of years or so ago, and I didn’t really want to do it again. So I
looked at the end of Matthew 17 and the story about tax and money and fishes,
but decided that would be too weird for a sermon. That left me with the
epileptic boy and Jesus’s comments about faith.
Some Bible passages are easy to understand; this is not one of
them. I read the passage through once. Then I read it a second time. And then I
prayed, read the passage a few more times, prayed, dug out some books, made
notes, prayed, and wished I had chosen an easier passage to preach on, like
Ezekiel 23 or Obadiah or the entire book of Revelation.
Anyway, I slowly began to see that faith is the heart of today’s
passage. Let me share with you some of my thoughts.
First of all, there are three kinds of faith mentioned in the
passage. In verse seventeen, Jesus says the generation is ‘perverse’ and ‘faithless’—literally,
‘no faith’. In the first part of verse twenty, Jesus says his disciples
have ‘little faith’—they have some faith, enough to distinguish them
from those who have no faith, but perhaps only just. What Jesus needs
his disciples to have, then, is not no faith, not little faith,
but faith—and ‘faith the size of a mustard seed’.
But what does all this mean? No faith should, I hope, be
fairly obvious: it simply means having no faith in God or in what God is doing.
I imagine that when Jesus talks about the ‘faithless and perverse generation’,
he’s meaning the crowd. Perhaps the people were laughing at the disciples as
they tried and failed to heal the epileptic boy. Perhaps the disciples had
bigged themselves up beforehand and their inability to heal the boy opened them
up to mockery. Matthew doesn’t tell us what happened, really, but it was enough
for Jesus to call the crowd ‘perverse’ and ‘faithless’.
So if that is no faith, what about little faith? Other
than one instance in Luke’s Gospel, Matthew is the only Gospel writer to use
this expression, so it’s clearly an important one for him. The phrase ‘little
faith’ tends specifically to imply a lack of faith or trust in God’s practical
care and support. So perhaps the disciples tried to heal the epileptic boy
trusting their own skills and abilities. Perhaps they doubted that God was
really going to do anything. Or perhaps they just felt awkward and fake. We
can’t say with any certainty what the issue was, other than they had little
faith.
Instead, what Jesus encourages the disciples to have is ‘faith the
size of a mustard seed’. Mustard seeds are very small and Jesus, by mentioning
mustard seeds and mountains in the same sentence, is clearly saying that you
don’t need to have huge amounts of faith to do God’s work: ‘faith the size of a
mustard seed’ is enough. Jesus isn’t saying that if the disciples had more
faith, then the boy would have been healed—at least, I don’t think that’s what
Jesus is saying. But how is ‘faith the size of a mustard seed’ different from
‘little faith’, when presumably both phrases refer to something very small?
I looked at the other places where ‘mustard seed’ appears in the
Gospels. The phrase only appears five times: twice in Luke, once in Mark, and
twice in Matthew. In three of those five instances, ‘mustard seed’ is a simile
for the kingdom of God and its growth from small beginnings. I might be reading
too much into things here, but I can’t help but wonder if Jesus’s use of the
phrase in today’s Gospel reading is deliberately bringing the kingdom of God to
mind. The Bible translations we use generally read ‘faith the size of a mustard
seed’, but the Greek is literally ‘faith as a mustard seed’—size isn’t
mentioned, at least not explicitly, and so I’m inclined to think that when
Jesus says you must have ‘faith as a mustard seed’, he’s meaning that
our faith should somehow be in line with God’s kingdom, which is like a mustard
seed germinating. The disciples’ little faith is not adequate because it
focuses on how much faith they have; but ‘mustard seed’ faith is not
concerned with how much faith they have, but on the kind of faith
they have. ‘Mustard seed’ faith is faith borne of the kingdom of heaven.
I chose Acts 3:1-16 as the New Testament reading for today because
I thought it might be a useful parallel. We heard the whole of this passage
read, but I want to focus here on verse sixteen: ‘And by faith in [Jesus’s]
name, his name itself has made this man strong, whom you see and know; and the
faith that is through Jesus has given him this perfect health in the presence
of all of you.’ In his speech, Peter is clear that he and John had nothing really
to do with the lame man’s healing. They had no magical healing powers of their
own. It had nothing to do with the amount of faith they had. Instead, they
simply spoke the name of Jesus, and the man was healed. Peter and John didn’t
heal the man; God in Christ healed the man.
Now we could get into all kinds of debates about why God doesn’t
heal more often. But in this instance, I look at Acts 3:4 and wonder how much
we should read into that word ‘intently’: ‘Peter looked intently at him,
as did John’. I’m inclined to think this is perhaps Luke’s way of saying that
Peter and John were somehow hearing God’s Holy Spirit tell them they needed to
heal this man now. Were Peter and John demonstrating ‘mustard
seed’ faith by listening to God’s prompting rather than by taking the
initiative and treating the Spirit as magical healing power? I think so. Luke
doesn’t say this, of course, but I do think it is a possibility.
I think this also goes some way in explaining why God doesn’t heal
people automatically when we pray in the name of Jesus: it is God who
initiates, and we respond. God is not at our disposal; rather, we are disciples
of Jesus, and so whom God heals and when is up to God. As I say, we could get
into all kinds of debates about why God doesn’t heal more often, especially in
these days of COVID-19, but that would require a sermon series or a longer
conversation at some other time and place. The point is that ‘mustard seed’
faith trusts—not blindly, but really—in the God and Father of our Lord Jesus
Christ.
So to bring all this back to Matthew 17, I think there are obvious
questions to ask ourselves: What sort of faith do I have? Do I have no
faith? Do I have little faith? Or do I have what I’ve been calling
‘mustard seed’ faith? I can’t answer these questions for you; that’s between
you and God. I can exclusively reveal that on a very good day, my faith is
probably still little faith. There are days when my faith in God is weakened by
my thoughts or my feelings or my circumstances. That is little faith because it
focuses on me. Nonetheless, I want God’s Spirit to transform my little faith
into ‘mustard seed’ faith so that I will cling to God in Christ no matter what,
even as I know that God in Christ already holds me. And I trust that God’s
Spirit will do this all in good time. This is what I want for me. Is this what you
want, too, for yourself?
I'm no expert (on anything) but I do wonder if you're on to something with the 'intently' thing. I'll certainly ponder on it if I ever end up preaching on that passage in Acts.
ReplyDeleteI should be clear that it's nothing to do with the word (atenizō) itself. atenizō just means 'to gaze' or 'to stare' (compare Acts 3:4's 'looked intently' with 3:12's 'stare'), so what I've suggested is definitely an interpretation rather than a plain translation (if ever there can be such a thing as the latter).
DeleteAs far as I can tell, there are fourteen instances of words based on atenizō in the NT, and only two of them are found outside Luke-Acts. So clearly it's one of the good physician's favoured words.