There are charts available online and presumably elsewhere comparing the amount of New Testament manuscripts with certain other ancient texts (e.g. Caesar’s Gallic Wars). The purpose of these charts is to emphasise the New Testament’s trustworthiness: if we have no need to doubt the reliability of the Gallic Wars, the reasoning goes, then certainly we should have no need to question the New Testament, which is far better attested. The flip side of this, of course, is that if we doubt the authenticity of the New Testament, then we should doubt that of classical texts, too.
The problem here is that while the logic appears sound, the data used in the charts is often outdated. This means Christian educators and apologists relying on this data are in fact relying on false data to prove a point. In Myths and Mistakes in New Testament Textual Criticism, edited by Elijah Hixson and Peter J. Gurry (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2019), James B. Prothro contributes a chapter (‘Myths about Classical Literature’, pp. 70–89) in which he tackles how to compare the New Testament texts and classical literature responsibly. I don’t want to go into Prothro’s chapter in detail here—you should read his essay and the whole book if you can—but I do want to produce my own chart comparing the numbers. And I want to do this partly so I can have a quick reference point for my own occasional teaching, but also because Prothro himself doesn’t tabulate the data. However, for his numbers, Prothro appears to draw largely from an article by Clay Jones which does contain a chart.
The following table is essentially a version of Clay Jones’s one but with minor amendments drawn from Prothro’s essay, pp. 75–78. It’s the kind of chart that will need to be updated from time to time as new manuscript discoveries are made. Please do leave a comment if you know of any numbers that need to be taken into account here.
Author |
Work |
Date Written |
Earliest Manuscripts |
Time Gap (years) |
Number of Manuscripts |
Homer |
Iliad |
800 bc |
c. 400 bc |
400 |
1,757 |
Herodotus |
History |
480–425 bc |
ad 100–200 fragments |
c. 600 |
109 |
Plato |
tetralogies |
400 bc |
895 |
1,300 |
210 |
Caesar |
Gallic Wars |
100–44 bc |
9th century |
950 |
251 |
Livy |
History of Rome |
59 bc—ad 17 |
early 5th century |
400 |
150 |
Tacitus |
Annals |
ad 100 |
1st half: 850; 2nd half: 1050 |
750–950 |
2 + 31 (dated 15th century) |
Thucydides |
History |
460–400 bc |
3rd century bc |
200 |
96 |
New Testament |
|
ad 50–100 |
ad 130 |
40 |
5,795 |
So what!
ReplyDeleteAnd why does everything have to turn out to be Christian!
Perhaps you read these two Illuminating essays by an author who thoroughly examined at a profound depth-level all of "historical" claims etc etc re the FABRICATED origins and POLITICAL purposes of the Bible.
www.dabase.org/up-5-3.htm
www.dabase.org/up-6.htm
Plus The Criticism That Cures the (godless) Heart.
www.dabase.org/up-1-6.htm
And why does everything have to turn out to be Christian!
ReplyDeleteStrangely enough, this post is primarily about Christian manuscripts . . .