Certain strands of Christianity thrive, it seems, on
excitement. When I came to faith in the late 1980s, immediately I dived enthusiastically
into the world of Christian paperbacks (The Cross and the Switchblade! God’s Smuggler! No Compromise!), Contemporary Christian Music, and Chick tracts,
all of which conspired to make it quite clear to my impressionable teenage mind
that following Jesus was (or should be) an ever-burning fire of evangelism that,
supported by signs and wonders and evidential apologetics, would lead Satan-blinded
wretches (i.e. my family and friends) to mass repentance and, importantly,
revival. Of course, revival never happened, despite my best attempts at
spreading the good news. By the time I started university in the mid-1990s, I had
toned the evangelistic efforts down a notch, and these days I merely want to
get on with my life as a genuinely faithful Christian but without the added pressure
of being responsible for billions of hellbound souls. Nonetheless, the idea
that Christianity is or should be exciting or radical or passionate is something
that still has its foot in the door of my brain. Old presumptions die hard.
A Theology of the Ordinary is the perfect antidote to
adrenalised Christianity. Julie Canlis opens her slim book (sixty-eight
postcard-sized pages) by noting how many recent books on Christian discipleship
appear to presuppose and encourage a journey of spiritual discovery and intensity
while downplaying the fact that discipleship for most people is conducted in
the workplace or at home and without clear-cut opportunities to mount a soapbox
and orate the gospel to the dying masses. Canlis does not scorn or reject the
need for passionate discipleship, but rather balances this against an equal
need to recognise the triune God’s presence in the everyday. As she expresses
it, ‘A robust trinitarian theology of the ordinary will not undermine being
passionate or sold-out but will ground and purify it’ (p. 3).
The majority of A Theology of the Ordinary relays what
Canlis calls ‘the trinitarian story’, looking at creation, redemption, and the
new creation, but all with a focus on how these affect the mundane. Much of the
chapter on creation outlines the increasingly popular idea that God’s good creation
is God’s temple, with humanity serving as priests within it. This notion provides
a framework for discussing how Jesus redeems and recreates (fallen) humanity in
and through his own life—‘Each stage of His “ordinary” human life was crucial
to the atonement’ (p. 30)—and for a series of observations on how the Holy
Spirit draws us to the Father through Christ (or places us in Christ to know
the Father) in the world. Canlis also provides as part of these three chapters
the relevant counter-stories—Gnosticism, Docetism, and Platonism—that she
believes militate against a truly Christian portrayal of ordinary life. Her
inclusion of these counter-stories is effective and demonstrates precisely why
good theology is necessary for the Church. Each chapter closes with questions
for further reflection, which makes this book an ideal read for church home groups
and the like.
It seems fitting to end this review with Canlis’s own
concluding words:
When we live our lives as ordinary persons [in Christ], we become an extraordinary picture to the world of what we were intended to be: God and humanity united together in heart and purpose. (p. 66)
Thank you, Jon, for giving me a copy of this book!
No comments:
Post a Comment