The biblical prophets are difficult to understand, but they’re
still relevant. In the context of the United Kingdom’s MPs voting in favour of air
strikes against so-called Islamic State strongholds in Syria, and in the light of the raids that took place soon afterwards, I cannot help but think how
relevant is today’s reading from Isaiah 28:
Hear now the word of the Lord,You men of mockery,Who govern that peopleIn Jerusalem!For you have said,“We have made a covenant with Death,Concluded a pact with Sheol.When the sweeping flood passes through,It shall not reach us;For we have made falsehood our refuge,Taken shelter in treachery.” (Isaiah 28:14-15)
I don’t think it can be asserted with any certainty that the
decision to bomb Syria is unequivocally
wrong. But I think it can be asserted, and reasonably so, that the mind-set
that assumes violence is the best response to violence is askew. Moreover, the UK
Government’s decision to respond violently strongly suggests a lack of communal
wisdom and geopolitical intelligence on the part of its members.
There is also a question about how divine sovereignty over
the nations is displayed. The remainder of Isaiah 28 speaks of how the Lord will annul the covenant with Death
(28:18) as the LORD brings
judgement. Decisions and actions, good or ill, globally or locally implemented
– these all have consequences.
But Isaiah brings a message of hope. Even when the Lord brings judgement, it is not the end:
Give diligent ear to my words,Attend carefully to what I say.Does he who ploughs to sowPlough all the time,Breaking up and furrowing his land?When he has smoothed its surface,Does he not rather broadcast black cuminAnd scatter cumin,Or set wheat in a row,Barley in a strip,And emmer in a patch?For He teaches him the right manner,His God instructs him.So, too, black cumin is not threshed with a threshing board,Nor is the wheel of a threshing sledge rolled over cumin;But black cumin is beaten out with a stickAnd cumin with a rod.It is cereal that is crushed.For even if he threshes it thoroughly,And the wheel of his sledge and his horses overwhelm it,He does not crush it.That, too, is ordered by the Lord of Hosts;His counsel is unfathomable,His wisdom marvellous. (Isaiah 28:23-39, my emphasis)
I dare say that there will be some disastrous consequences
to the UK Government’s decision to join the current military strategy against
so-called Islamic State in Syria; but the Christian hope remains that God will somehow
bring good from it, and all the other evils in the world, because ultimately
the Lord’s desire is not to devastate
but to grow.
'...ultimately the Lord’s desire is not to devastate but to grow.' Amen.
ReplyDeleteGood to see you online again, Sandy. I hope your break was beneficial.
DeleteVery, thanks :-)
Delete"I think it can be asserted, and reasonably so, that the mind-set that assumes violence is the best response to violence is askew."
ReplyDeleteI wholeheartedly agree with this sentence in particular.
I struggle hugely with the whole question of whether military involvement in any conflict can ever be justified in Christian terms. On the whole, I'm not sure that it can... but then I'm very aware that we live in a deeply imperfect world where what's ideal can't always be achieved in practice, and sometimes we have to settle for the lesser of two evils.
But I do nonetheless very strongly query the assumption that countering violence with violence is ultimately productive, beneficial or morally justifiable.
I think war can be justified under certain conditions (though what those conditions are, I couldn't say!); but so much military action at the moment seems to smack only of playground politics.
Delete