In 1589 . . . , Jane Anger took up a challenging position by insisting that Eve was superior to Adam: a second, and hence improved, model. Whereas Adam was fashioned from ‘dross and filthy clay’, God made Eve from Adam’s flesh, ‘that she might be purer than he’, which ‘doth evidently show how far we women are more excellent than men . . . From woman sprang man’s salvation. A woman was the first that believed, and a woman likewise the first that repented of sin.’ Anger then descends crossly, and comically, to everyday domestic life. It is women, she reminds us, who make sure that men are fed, clothed, and cleaned: ‘without our care they lie in their beds as dogs in litter, and go like lousy mackerel swimming in the heat of summer’.Margaret Walters, Feminism: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), p. 9
As I said, I find this quotation very interesting. While I’d come
across a number of early female theologians (e.g. Julian of Norwich) who spoke
of God using feminine imagery, I had no idea that what could be labelled feminism
started so early – indeed, during the reign of Elizabeth I and the English
Reformation. I find it interesting, too, that a publication such as Anger’s (snappily
entitled Jane Anger her protection for women, to defend them against the
scandalous reportes of a late surfeiting lover, and all other like venerians
that complaine so to bee overcloyed with women's kindnesse) arose – and possibly could only have
arisen – during a time of intense cultural change. It’s almost as though the
changes in the religious and intellectual climates at this time created the
conditions in which many people, including women, felt free enough and
empowered enough to make their voices heard. Strange, then, that today – and I
admit this next comment is probably little more than a cheap (but valid) shot –
today, many sections in the same Church that once, however unwittingly, enabled
women to speak are now demanding women be silenced. Why do we praise men but
curse women? To evoke James: ‘My brothers, this should not be!’
No comments:
Post a Comment