Not long after this, I discovered G. K. Beale’s The Temple and the Church’s Mission. It’s
perhaps a cliché to talk about a book being revolutionary, but The Temple was truly this for my research.
It opened me to a whole world of ideas – what Margaret Barker calls ‘temple theology’ – that I see as having a potentially enormous impact on the doctrine
of providence. My doctorate – now published, of course (plug, plug), as Providence Made Flesh – in large part ended
up an attempt to lay a foundation for providence that took into account the eschatological
trajectory Beale notes in Scripture: that the garden is to become a city
through faithful human action, and that the whole of creation is to become the
holy of holies, the place of God’s presence. I could not have achieved what I
did without my now well-thumbed copy of The
Temple.
Tuesday, 27 January 2015
In Gratitude to G. K. Beale
It was 2004; I’d been working on my doctorate on providence
for just over a year and was a little unsure of where I was going with my
thoughts. I’d reached a point where I wanted to argue for a non-deterministic
account of providence but didn’t know how to construct such an argument. My
basic presupposition at this point was that God had created the world and left
it to run according to its own laws but in such a way that ‘deism’ didn’t become
an issue. Deism, for me, implied absence; but God remains present, even if the
world is autopoietic (to use Niels Henrik Gregersen’s term). And so I started
thinking about how, in Scripture, divine presence is intimately connected with
the temple. But I knew next to nothing about the temple beyond the most basic
things.
The prompt for this post is my awareness that the content of
The Temple has been ‘distilled’ into
a new, less technical book, God Dwells Among Us. According to the publication blurb, Mitchell Kim, lead pastor at
Living Water Alliance Church, preached a series of sermons based on The Temple, and these sermons have themselves
been expanded and published as God Dwells.
Thus God Dwells appears to be aimed
more at Christians who don’t want or need to get into the depth of The Temple. One chapter, entitled ‘Why
Haven’t I Seen This Before? Hermeneutical Reflections’, looks particularly
interesting. Given the prevalence of the temple theme in Scripture, I’ve often
wondered why few theologians and biblical scholars seem to give it a second
glance (cf. N. T. Wright’s comments in Paul and the Faithfulness of God), and I’d be interested to read Beale’s own
reflections on the possible reasons why.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment